Forum
      

Question for the Guru's,...

13 years 7 months ago #40473 by wlayton
Replied by wlayton on topic Re: Question for the Guru's,...

NC_Dawg wrote:

Mike Honcho wrote: We will NEVER see AM's full potential until he has a solid line to play behind.


Excellent point!! Same can be said for Stafford, who was never really afforded the protection that other QB's have enjoyed. BTW: I complete agree with your assessment of MS. For me, Matthew was a disappointment...He never became part of what COULD have made us great again...sadly!

wlayton wrote: then Ramsey will take over after a redshirt year....he's a player


Ahhhh, yes Brice will certainly add an element of intrigue, particularly when you consider we'll have Christain LeMay already in the mix!!!....And it begins again?!?!?!....See where I'm going with this???



Yes I do......my other prediction was that CL will transfer once Ramsey gets there.

Man, I'm making some potentially stupid looking predictions with HM and CL, huh?;)

PVBDAWG

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
13 years 7 months ago #40474 by Buc
Replied by Buc on topic Re: Question for the Guru's,...
Mike Honcho posted:
It's not what Richt does with QB's that's the problem...it's what he does with the linemen that protect his QB's that gets him in trouble. We will NEVER see AM's full potential until he has a solid line to play behind.


Mike, another good assessment by you. Standing on the sidelines watching the posts in this thread.

Take AM out and exactly where would this team be? Read all of the posts on this board screaming at the offensive line. When the offensive line is not good, what chance does AM have or IC or anyone?

TK served notice in the off season that he was ready to step up and make all of us feel better about AJ going pro. I watched the UT game more than once, I don't buy what he said at all. Won't go into it, just watch TK and the things he did not do in the UT game and other games. Looks like there might be some soured feelings about a certain freshman from Valdosta. My opinion.

Will continue to watch this thread, could turn out to be a lot of fun . . . . :)

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
13 years 7 months ago #40476 by NC_Dawg
Replied by NC_Dawg on topic Re: Question for the Guru's,...

wlayton wrote: Man, I'm making some potentially stupid looking predictions with HM and CL, huh?;)


Pretty bold stuff my friend!!!...

thriller wrote: I a LOT of knocks on CMR, most glaringly his obstinate support of certain coordinators, past and present, whose performances left/leave much to be desired....., but I do NOT blame him for poor QB development.


Is it possible that CMR, himself, is more interested in developing QB talent for BEYOND collegiate play, rather than focusing on the MNC?

"My advice to you is to start drinking heavily." - Bluto

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • NC_Dawg
  • NC_Dawg's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Junk Yard Dawg
More
13 years 7 months ago #40477 by NC_Dawg
Replied by NC_Dawg on topic Re: Question for the Guru's,...

Buc wrote: Will continue to watch this thread, could turn out to be a lot of fun . . . . :)


Like HELL....Get your hashmark thinking, narrow arse in this discussion!!! That's an order!

"My advice to you is to start drinking heavily." - Bluto

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • NC_Dawg
  • NC_Dawg's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Junk Yard Dawg
More
13 years 7 months ago #40478 by Buc
Replied by Buc on topic Re: Question for the Guru's,...
Always liked your suttle approach over the years NC_Dawg. Private Buc reporting SIR. :)

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
13 years 7 months ago #40479 by wlayton
Replied by wlayton on topic Re: Question for the Guru's,...

Buc wrote: Always liked your suttle approach over the years NC_Dawg. Private Buc reporting SIR. :)



I thought you were a General.;)

PVBDAWG

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
Time to create page: 0.108 seconds