Agree or Disagree, or Whatever . . . .

I'll take it....at least it seems to be a step in the right direction. I actually like having an "offensive ST coach" and a "defensive ST coach". Like breaking things down on ST's and maybe making things a little simpler on ST's as well....hopefully it will create more focus and therefore better execution.

(fingers crossed)

wlayton wrote: I'll take it....at least it seems to be a step in the right direction. I actually like having an "offensive ST coach" and a "defensive ST coach". Like breaking things down on ST's and maybe making things a little simpler on ST's as well....hopefully it will create more focus and therefore better execution.

(fingers crossed)

with you, any type of move has got to be better than what was being done...

Maybe it is what was not being done.

On the Bradley article, only thing I read that made any real sense ..... The principles might not be all that different from what Georgia fans have been seeing. The coaching, on the other hand, might well be better.

Only thing that is important is that the other guys offense is stopped. 3 -4 or 4 -3 I could care less. JMHO

Go Dawgs! GATA!

Speaking of special teams. On signing day CMR was asked about special teams coaching. At first he made a joke about "who put this kid up to asking that question"? Then made a comment about some changes being made to an enormous ovation by the crowd.

Let's hope so.

TN Dawg wrote:
Only thing that is important is that the other guys offense is stopped. 3 -4 or 4 -3 I could care less. JMHO

Go Dawgs! GATA!

It's not just yo humble opinion... it's the opinion of all the Bulldawg nation.

Stop the other teams O's and no one will ever say a negative word about how they line up. I wouldn't care if they lined up in the old KC front while wearing tutus if they can start playing serious D.