- Posts: 10054
- Thank you received: 1252
Kunena Menu
Improvement Really ?
- wlayton
- Offline
- Junk Yard Dawg

PVBDAWG
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- sadlerdawg
-
- Offline
- Junk Yard Dawg
- Posts: 3220
- Thank you received: 1177
so yeah, with even halfway decent coaching, I was expecting a 60 minute juggernaut offense.
The SMART era CONTINUES!!!!!!
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- ogredawg
-
- Offline
- Junk Yard Dawg
- Posts: 1835
- Thank you received: 1146
AllDawgs5 wrote: I am with both of those. All that I have seen is still capable of happening. Are we as strong as I would like, no. There is a lot of inexperience, and it has shown at times. That is why I haven't been to hard on AM, he is still a young qb. Life was easier for him last year. When you have one of the best WR's to ever play college football, that helps. Heard, last year bama struggled on D because of the talent they lost. Look at what UGA's offense has lost, either to the NFL, or because guys didn't want to hang around.
I guess my question is, did people really expect our offense, with a young qb, a freshman RB, a relatively inexperienced O-L that is very thin not to mention they are breaking in a new O-L coach, and a young inexperienced WR corp, to be an absolute jugernaut? Even with the loses, we are still averaging around 30pts a game in SEC play.
3 costly turnovers. 3 plays.
GO DAWGS
OL inexperienced I beg to differ....thin yes no depth yes....inexperienced WR corps MM is the only new one you have several who have been around for a while....TE can also go wide and in the "slot" so with this offense the least I expect is it to play 4 qtrs. of football.....30 points a game not over the last 2 games we have not and 59 were scored against CC so the 30 pts a game is a padded stat...take away the 59 against CC and see what kinda of average you get....if the O gives me 4 good qtrs of football then I will shut up.......until then the O sucks......
thecountrynation.com
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- wlayton
- Offline
- Junk Yard Dawg
- Posts: 10054
- Thank you received: 1252
- ogredawg
-
- Offline
- Junk Yard Dawg
- Posts: 1835
- Thank you received: 1146
wlayton wrote: 28.5
Thanks did not have my calculator handy :silly:
thecountrynation.com
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- AllDawgs5
-
- Offline
- Junk Yard Dawg
- Posts: 10779
- Thank you received: 358
AM is a little bit of mystery to me. He is having some troubles. A lot have to do with protection. Maybe some have to do with the losses of Green and Durham. I would trade those 2 for all the receivers you have mentioned above. Stats wise I would have agreed about Murray. He does not seem to be a great game manager at this point in his career. I believe he will get it. I really hope because I like how the kid plays the game minus the turnovers.
GO DAWGS
Please Log in to join the conversation.