FOOTBALL IS OVER . . . .

I think we're all waiting to see results on he field, but if we refuse to or stop speculating... we pretty much kill the message board business.

My expectations are only this..... a defense that doesn't embarrass me and that shows it belongs in the SEC.

Pruitt has a lot of players that could easily be on other rosters in the SEC.

One of a couple of things that I like about Pruitt, teaches, demands sure tackling. Also like the thoughts of 4-2-5 and 3 down with variations. Pruitt said publicly, Georgia is a 3/4 team, with variables.

Most important thing he said in my opinion . . . . we will run the defense according to the team we will face off with the following week. If Pruitt has these young pups playing fast from the beginning, it will be night changed to day on the defensive side. Opponents will have to see young players flying to the ball, not running around waving their arms and pointing fingers.

Recruit and get more offensive linemen like Kublanow and then we can start talking final four.

There are times on this board that I mention that players, coaches and others read what is in the media and various boards. While the Georgia coaches the past few years have denied reading the boards, I call BS.

Below is a recent article in the AJC that is worth looking at if anyone thinks players don't check us out. Read the comment section.

Find it strange that grantham is going to coach defensive backs, just happens to be one of Pruitt's specailties. grantham will show us by golly . . . .

recruiting.blog.ajc.com/2014/01/18/alvin...-alabama-per-report/

sadlerdawg, thanks for the bump.

Not trying to be ugly. You, I and others know that we have been through this coaching change "thingy" more than once. Gets real frustrating every time there is a coaching change, Georgia is back on the map again when reading different blogs.

As growl said in this thread . . . . "show me". Because we bring up "things" that we have seen before does not mean that we are not serious backers of the "Athens Project". It has turned out to be just that, a project since the 1940's, one title since then, Herschel and his group. Maybe there is something wrong with the "project".

In my opinion, it is not fair to us that one hire each year or ever so often and the program is ready to compete for the National Championship. Quite frankly, too many in my opinion are ready for a "quick fix".

Truth be told . . . . mark richt needed Jeremy Pruitt, a lot more than Jeremy Pruitt needed mark richt. Pruitt has been around some head coaches that understand how to move a program forward, (High School through National Champions x 2) not like we have been . . . . on a roller coaster. Everything that is being said here is out there for anyone that "really cares" about moving forward . . . . not just feeling good. I said that.

Yes I do understand that mark richt was with a National Championship team (FSU). How has that aided him in the past 13 years? How has that helped the University of Georgia in the past 13 years? If a different head coach had spent 13 years in Athens, would we have produced more? What if? What happened in Tuscaloosa and Tallahassee in far fewer years? Again, JMO.

Yeah Buc. I know Pruitt was a good hire, but is he our savior? Hoe so but kinda doubt it. For some reminiscing, I went back and read posts from when Grantham was hired. Change the name to Pruitt, and many of those posts are interchangeable with many posts from ths past week.

sadlerdawg wrote: Yeah Buc. I know Pruitt was a good hire, but is he our savior? Hoe so but kinda doubt it. For some reminiscing, I went back and read posts from when Grantham was hired. Change the name to Pruitt, and many of those posts are interchangeable with many posts from ths past week.

Confession, I did some of that.