- Posts: 10779
- Thank you received: 358
Buc wrote:
Mike Honcho wrote: Did it occur to anyone that playing with a patchwork offensive line, true freshman/first time starters at RB, first time starters at FB, a plethora of freshman at WR...maybe we COULDN'T call all the plays we normally would?
If I take being a fan out of the equation and just look at it from an analytical stand-point, I'd say being in the top 5 in the SEC of LITERALLY every major offensive category is a pretty good accomplishment.
Let the bashing begin...
Don't think there needs to be any bashing, unless you are looking for that.
Go back to your post and maybe ask youself this question . . . . why are we so dependent on playing first timers at the positions you speak of. Should we not have planned for that during the recruiting process more than a year or two back. Yes, everyone has injuries, however some have better plans than others.
If I am the head coach or the offensive coordinator, my job is larger than trying to get the best back or wide receiver. The wins and losses start in the offensive and defensive lines. You don't protect, you take a knee. Sound familiar . . . .
Mark Richt put out the call for a running back, risking NCAA problems . . . . did he not just sign one of the best this past year according to the talking heads, think so. No crystal balls, but if we ever expect to be "all that" better do as Coach Grantham suggested, give me someone to play the nose. That seemed to work out for the D side. Deployment saved our country from bad things many years ago because "some" of the leaders had a plan.
I enjoy posting with you, one of the reasons, you go past one line statements that don't move the cursor one way or the other.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.