Two Simple reasons we beat Boise State by 14

Buc wrote:

You sound much like many of the politicians in this country. Go to a different site or different group and the message never changes. Your team has no problems with speed as you informed us in one of your posts. So I assume we can drop that particular part of your retoric.

Let's play a game of Red Rover, Red Rover, send that incredible back right over. Moore would be smart to get the ball out of his hands and in into your running backs hands. There will be no place to hide in the Atlanta dome.

Attitude and talent, check those two out on September 3rd.

You seem to play or try to play a game of internet football. Too bad that Boise State did not get a chance to play UCF last year. BS could not handle Nevada, sure as heck could not play with UCF. Then again, according to BS fans, you can beat anyone, and I like this expression which has been used for ages . . . . On any given Saturday.

Dress 'em out, let's play some football. Georgia wins by 14.[/quote]

I don't recall saying we had no problems with speed. I said I was impressed and that speed kills. I was refering to you guys, not BSU. I concede that your team is faster and it scares me.

As far as Moore getting the ball out of his hands, there is a reason he's only been sacked 24 times in three years, and it's not just the O line, and it certainly isn't his mobility. He would have to speed up to be as mobile as a tree.

And it's too bad you didn't get to play Nevada last year, instead of (Div 1AA) Idaho State, so you could look forward to improving on 5-8, instead of 6-7.

I really can't figure out why you have so much respect for us and why in the world we would make you nervous........geez, you're play a 6-7 team for crying out loud.

"As far as Moore getting the ball out of his hands, there is a reason he's only been sacked 24 times in three years, and it's not just the O line, and it certainly isn't his mobility. He would have to speed up to be as mobile as a tree. "

Yes sevee, there is a reason he doesn't get sacked:

vs. Virginia Tech
at Wyoming
Oregon State
at New Mexico State
Toledo
at San Jose State
Louisiana Tech Hawai'i Idaho
Fresno State Nevada
Utah

Impressive

Seevee,

As for speed...keep in mind that when we played UCF (as well as the other 12 games last year) not only were we playing under a brand new Def Coordinator, but we were playing in a completely new scheme (4-3 to 3-4) which a) we hadn't recruited players for and b) hadn't had time to completely learn. Point being, I don't care how fast someone is on paper...if they're not totally confident/comfortable with their assignment and what they should be doing, they don't have the ability to go full-tilt.

Next weekend you'll see a defense that has had a full year plus an off-season to acclimate themselves to the new scheme, as well as several players that our D. Coordinator had a hand in recruiting to the program SPECIFICALLY to play in a 3-4. And believe me...it will not be the same team that you saw against UCF.

Gotta agree with Honcho. There is a big difference between pure running speed and football speed. We'll have both on D this year. We have a NT(350+) that can run a 4.5 forty. That's almost as fast as your RB there seevee...

DawgnLA wrote:

Gotta agree with Honcho. There is a big difference between pure running speed and football speed. We'll have both on D this year. We have a NT(350+) that can run a 4.5 forty. That's almost as fast as your RB there seevee...

That's a scary thought....you know?