seevee wrote:
What I don't get is how, with all this speed and size, you guys lost to UCF. I just looked at their roster and I'd say, yes, they are bigger than BSU, but not by much.
I suppose it's the same reason I read from SEC fans about why Alabama lost to Utah. Lack of interest, disappointment in the season, not a big enough challenge, etc.
What it says to me is that size and speed are OVER RATED. I remember reading a classic Sports Illustrated article about Larry Bird when he was still at Indiana State, and how a lot of NBA scouts thought he was too slow for the NBA game. Same lack of speed applies to Jerry Rice who ran a 4.5 or 4.6 forty.
Point is, attitude, talent, and coaching can overcome speed and size. You guys proved that in the UCF game.
I'm just hoping we have enough intangibles working for us that we can overcome what is an obvious difference in measurables. That's why they play the game on grass/turf instead of on paper/internet.
You sound much like many of the politicians in this country. Go to a different site or different group and the message never changes. Your team has no problems with speed as you informed us in one of your posts. So I assume we can drop that particular part of your retoric.
Let's play a game of Red Rover, Red Rover, send that incredible back right over. Moore would be smart to get the ball out of his hands and in into your running backs hands. There will be no place to hide in the Atlanta dome.
Attitude and talent, check those two out on September 3rd.
You seem to play or try to play a game of internet football. Too bad that Boise State did not get a chance to play UCF last year. BS could not handle Nevada, sure as heck could not play with UCF. Then again, according to BS fans, you can beat anyone, and I like this expression which has been used for ages . . . . On any given Saturday.
Dress 'em out, let's play some football. Georgia wins by 14.