Vanderbilt vs UGA . . .Unfinished Business

The goal of every team is to win every game they play. Even Vanderbilt and Wake Forest - and it's ALWAYS been that way. That doesn't mean they'll succeed or even come close, as history demonstrates. The "extra-curricular" aspects of the game won't help them either. The Commodes will lose this game - Missouri is similar in style to Vandy and better at it.

Having said that, I think it'll be a lot closer than many think. That's because UGA keeps starting slow and "feeling the other team out" before stepping up and getting aggressive, at least this year. I think I like that better than the previous strategy of starting in a blaze of glory and just clinging for dear life not to lose the game at the end.

However the game goes, I just hope Todd Gurley gets run out of bounds on the Vandy sideline and lowers his helmet straight into Franklin's face and busts his nose wide open. Nothing would please me more than to see a bloody ice bag on that moron's face.

UGA 38 Vandy 31.

You think Vandy will score 31 points???? Really? I think Vandy's D is stronger than their offense, they play D pretty aggressively and tough. It won't matter against this year's offense though....we will still light them up.

I say.....34-13

Our D will be ready from the "get go".

Going with the goose-egg!

27 - 0

wlayton wrote: You think Vandy will score 31 points???? Really? I think Vandy's D is stronger than their offense, they play D pretty aggressively and tough. It won't matter against this year's offense though....we will still light them up.

I say.....34-13

Our D will be ready from the "get go".

Sadly, wlayton, our "D" hasn't exactly blown me away this year against anyone we've played, except in spurts near the end of games. I think the Commodes come in jacked up and their QB runs all over the field for one half, and we give them AT LEAST two blown coverages. We may even be down at the half, like 17-14. I'm just going with history from this season.

Not saying we lose, because so far our "O" is performing. I just would like to see our "D" stop somebody before I predict they will do it.

I certainly hear ya thriller. Do believe our D has been in early disarray mainly because we have played some freshmen and have been cross traing some players. Also been a little tough with those 4 starters out, of which 2 are back. Just believe CTG will not be "experimenting" from now on, think he will go back to his normal schemes during the SEC part of the schedule.

Will say that I would feel a whole lot better if Tree and Rambo were playing. Also not sure if Rogers will play against us Sat. If he's out that helps bigtime.

wlayton wrote: I certainly hear ya thriller. Do believe our D has been in early disarray mainly because we have played some freshmen and have been cross traing some players. Also been a little tough with those 4 starters out, of which 2 are back. Just believe CTG will not be "experimenting" from now on, think he will go back to his normal schemes during the SEC part of the schedule.

Will say that I would feel a whole lot better if Tree and Rambo were playing. Also not sure if Rogers will play against us Sat. If he's out that helps bigtime.

I hope you are right, and I hope Rogers is out (I haven't kept up with other teams personnel issues). Still, my concern is that below average offenses have driven the field on us, and those BLOWN ASSIGNMENTS! Probably nothing yanks my chain worse than blown coverage - probably because even I could blow a pass coverage. Our safeties have been getting sucked in by BAD play action. Receivers running behind safeties = me ANGRY.

[On another note - sure hope Missouri picks their game up this weekend]