- Posts: 10545
- Thank you received: 93
Kunena Menu
Not For Thin Skins . . . . Real Talk
- duck
- Offline
- Junk Yard Dawg
Like Buc said I don't foresee our OL being any better this year than before, I do however believe our D will be better, has to be after last year, not to sure what to expect from ST, but again has to be better than last year.
One problem I see is our head coach, for me I do not believe we will ever win the SEC much less play in the NC. He just does not know how to coach, does not know how to motivate. Why do we play every team down on their level, how often do we blow out a team. CMR is just not the man to lead us, he has to come up with gemicks to try to get these kids motivated, something is not right.
One last thing, HM will be our QB unless he gets hurt, I will bet you is does not matter how poorly HM may play, no other QB will play unless HM gets hurt. I'm not saying the HM is not our guy, but Like Buc said, he is not a runner like Futon, but MR is loyal, and HM stayed and waited his turn, so you can bet he will play no matter how good the others perform. That is the other problem I have with CMR, will not us the best players on the field.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Buc
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Junk Yard Dawg
- Posts: 14391
- Thank you received: 8531
There is no doubt that Pruitt will coach that way. Also believe he will play more young men than we have seen play defense previously in 13 years.
He will build depth through "earned" minutes in practice, film room and books. Believe he will play and replay young pups until he finds the lead dog at a particular position. That is the first step to building a defense that helps a team reach the final four.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Buc
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Junk Yard Dawg
- Posts: 14391
- Thank you received: 8531
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- wlayton
- Offline
- Junk Yard Dawg
- Posts: 10054
- Thank you received: 1252
My point was simply that the offense wasn't the problem and may need a 20% tweeking where the D and ST's need 75% tweeking.....at least.
Imo, our offense put up enough points to win any ballgame. PLUS, a big thing to me we don't think that much about is how many possessions the offense gets per game. If the D could stop ANYBODY our offense may get 2-3 more possessions a game.
That certainly contributed to FSU's scoring so many points and winning by such large margins.
PVBDAWG
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Buc
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Junk Yard Dawg
- Posts: 14391
- Thank you received: 8531
wlayton wrote: Loved Shockley (heck I named my dog after him). I, too want a mobile QB, but in a pro style offense.
My point was simply that the offense wasn't the problem and may need a 20% tweeking where the D and ST's need 75% tweeking.....at least.
Imo, our offense put up enough points to win any ballgame. PLUS, a big thing to me we don't think that much about is how many possessions the offense gets per game. If the D could stop ANYBODY our offense may get 2-3 more possessions a game.
That certainly contributed to FSU's scoring so many points and winning by such large margins.
Quarterback was pretty good also.

Please Log in to join the conversation.
- wlayton
- Offline
- Junk Yard Dawg
- Posts: 10054
- Thank you received: 1252
Buc wrote:
wlayton wrote: Loved Shockley (heck I named my dog after him). I, too want a mobile QB, but in a pro style offense.
My point was simply that the offense wasn't the problem and may need a 20% tweeking where the D and ST's need 75% tweeking.....at least.
Imo, our offense put up enough points to win any ballgame. PLUS, a big thing to me we don't think that much about is how many possessions the offense gets per game. If the D could stop ANYBODY our offense may get 2-3 more possessions a game.
That certainly contributed to FSU's scoring so many points and winning by such large margins.
Quarterback was pretty good also.
So was ours.
PVBDAWG
Please Log in to join the conversation.