- Posts: 386
- Thank you received: 288
ogredawg wrote:
BullDawg2010 wrote: I wonder why no one ever praises Richt for coaching a good game, but they sure as hell will start shouting when he coaches a bad one.
That is his JOB. He is paid a lot of money to coach to the best of his ability and to WIN.
Period.
So I am supposed to give him an attaboy for doing his job?
wlayton wrote: Sadlerdawg is the example of the point being made here.
Blast him for bad coaching if you want, then give him some props if he coaches a good game....
BullDawg2010 wrote:
ogredawg wrote:
BullDawg2010 wrote: I wonder why no one ever praises Richt for coaching a good game, but they sure as hell will start shouting when he coaches a bad one.
That is his JOB. He is paid a lot of money to coach to the best of his ability and to WIN.
Period.
So I am supposed to give him an attaboy for doing his job?
If you are going to criticize his play calling when he loses, you can also give an "atta boy" when he coaches well.
I'm just suprised, not that I should be, at the amount of hate he gets even when his team shows signs of improvement.
What I'm saying is that I've noticed is that the anti Richt dawgs bark loud when he loses, but are muzzled when he wins, not just on this board but on others that I go to and day to day dawg fans I converse with in person.
It's okay to bash him when he loses, but it's not okay to give him a thumbs up when he wins?
I'm not singling anyone out in these posts. Just bc I quoted you doesn't mean I am talking directly about you. Last year there were a few posters on this board, but mainly other boards, who showed up after SC bashing Richt for the blowout loss, in which they had every right to do btw. But were completely silent until the loss in Atlanta, in which case the offense and Richt didn't lose that game for georgia.ogredawg wrote:
BullDawg2010 wrote:
ogredawg wrote:
BullDawg2010 wrote: I wonder why no one ever praises Richt for coaching a good game, but they sure as hell will start shouting when he coaches a bad one.
That is his JOB. He is paid a lot of money to coach to the best of his ability and to WIN.
Period.
So I am supposed to give him an attaboy for doing his job?
If you are going to criticize his play calling when he loses, you can also give an "atta boy" when he coaches well.
I'm just suprised, not that I should be, at the amount of hate he gets even when his team shows signs of improvement.
What I'm saying is that I've noticed is that the anti Richt dawgs bark loud when he loses, but are muzzled when he wins, not just on this board but on others that I go to and day to day dawg fans I converse with in person.
It's okay to bash him when he loses, but it's not okay to give him a thumbs up when he wins?
Hate is a strong word and I tend not to use it.
I take offense that you say I am muzzled when he wins. I am by far muzzled on this board about anything on this team. Be it coaching or players. I lay it on the line but do not and mostly refuse to put the blame on the players.
CMR has won yes but he has been a mediocre coach. The early years he WON with another coaches talent all be it Donnan and Goff could not win with the talent and CMR did.
He has had more mediocre seasons than he has good ones. Been a long time since 2005 and he has more NFL caliber talent today than he did 8-9 years ago. Have we seen improvement in his coaching attitude, yes we have and I have stated just that. Did I say the coaches and I use plural because CMR cannot do it all by himself did coach a good game Saturday, yes I did so THEY did get the attaboy from me because they did thier JOB.
CMR is not the one to lead us into the future of playoff football and this will possibly his last chance to win the Crystal Trophy. Hope he proves me wrong but IMHO it ain't gonna happen.
BullDawg2010 wrote:
ogredawg wrote:
BullDawg2010 wrote: I wonder why no one ever praises Richt for coaching a good game, but they sure as hell will start shouting when he coaches a bad one.
That is his JOB. He is paid a lot of money to coach to the best of his ability and to WIN.
Period.
So I am supposed to give him an attaboy for doing his job?
If you are going to criticize his play calling when he loses, you can also give an "atta boy" when he coaches well.
I'm just suprised, not that I should be, at the amount of hate he gets even when his team shows signs of improvement.
What I'm saying is that I've noticed is that the anti Richt dawgs bark loud when he loses, but are muzzled when he wins, not just on this board but on others that I go to and day to day dawg fans I converse with in person.
It's okay to bash him when he loses, but it's not okay to give him a thumbs up when he wins?