My 2 obvious impressions from Sanford....

wlayton wrote: He may have already taken over the play calling....

I think he is calling some of the plays and over ruling on others......Bobo still has a lot of say so over what is called IMO

sadlerdawg wrote:

wlayton wrote: He may have already taken over the play calling....

That's one of the mistakes that I've said would need to be corrected for us to win out.

Forget details, if the "program" wins out do they deserve continued bashing etc...


nevermind......tried a simple question and it became too analytical.

wlayton wrote:

sadlerdawg wrote:

wlayton wrote: He may have already taken over the play calling....

That's one of the mistakes that I've said would need to be corrected for us to win out.

Forget details, if the "program" wins out do they deserve continued bashing etc...


nevermind......tried a simple question and it became too analytical.

Wlayton, do they deserve the bashing? Not sure...will they continue to get bashed? You've obviously got two basic sides here...the side of the fanbase that wants Richt to stay and the side of the fanbase that wants him to go. I think the one thing both sides agree on is that EVERYONE (minus maybe his wife and 43 kids) thinks Bobo should be gone, regardless of wins/losses. My personal opinion:

Win 9+ games and can Bobo = happy fanbase
Less than 9, Bobo stays, or any combination of the two = unhappy fanbase and the bashing continues

wlayton wrote: Forget details, if the "program" wins out do they deserve continued bashing etc...


nevermind......tried a simple question and it became too analytical.

Sorry, didn't mean to inject analysis into a message board simple question.

Actually the forum has analyzed the subject to death. I was just looking for a simple "yes" or "no" answer to an interesting scenario that could develope (guess I was the only one thinking it was interesting).

"Wartdawg, I know he wouldn't be fired...10-2, no way. Reread......would the staff still be bashed, criticised, etc, at the end of the year? Would we all still be up in arms with the staff?"

It's a question with no definitive answer.

Within a group of people who know enough about the game to analyze coaching, there are some who would say a win is a win and that's all that matters and some who will always say "yes we won, but...."

It becomes an individual question for each one of us. Instead of it being would "we", it truly
becomes "would you".

I probably would still bring up the issues and criticisms, because I think it leads to interesting
discussions.. especially on a message board of knowledgeable fans. It's in my genes to critically
analyze and always say 10-2 was great, but what do we need to do to go 12-0 next year.