wlayton wrote:
Buc and sadlerdawg, here's a different take on KM from my source. Not saying I agree with him but he is pretty knowledgable and pretty sharp.......
"I think they should avoid playing him if possible. The season’s half-way over, and he’s not going to play over King and Ealey, assuming that King is only suspended for a game or so. I think he’ll be a serviceable back, but he’s not a superstar."
Definitely sound reasoning, wlayton, however, I don't think the other KM would have seen much playing time his RS freshman year had Lumpkin and Brown not gotten hurt, so why not play this KM? If he's a superstar, he'll leave after 3 years anyway like KM and this year is wasted, if not, what's lost? A servicable back for 3 and half years as opposed to 4. Just my $.02.