GATORstrong wrote:
Buc I generally agree with everything that you have to post, but not this time. I am not making excuses for UT, just speculating on whether the game is different if CM plays. I personally think it is different. Bama may still win, but the kid has been in New York 2 years in a row. To say that the game would not have been different is ludacris. I have a great respect for Gilbert stepping into that game and looking the Bama D in the face and not backing down. He will be a special player in the years to come.
We got outplayed in ATl, no excuses, but we were in Atl. Remember that.
GATORstrong, we come to these boards for a couple of reasons . . . . to read what others think and to post our opinions. What a sad world it would be if all of us had the same chains of thought.
I can not speak for you of course, but it makes me wonder how much attention you pay to football as a whole, rather than say . . . . Florida football.
The game could have certainly been different if UT does not lose its QB, but the question also arises . . . explain to me with McCoy in the game does it not change the way Bama coached by Saban does not work the gridiron differently . . .
Florida did not lose their QB in ATL, and by the way, TT went to New York more than McCoy did and also came away with the hardware . . . what was the outcome. Is McCoy better than Tebow . . . simple statement would be fine. Bama whipped both UT and UF's butts because they are a better team, with or without the opposing QB playing.
I like it when folks want to quote statistics, especially when they use the \"short\" run.
We got outplayed in ATl, no excuses, but we were in Atl. Remember that.[/quote]
Ever take the time to check the overall record? Just sayin' . . . .