dapolla wrote:
Here's a great Yahoo! Sports article on Tim Tebow's legacy of utter and complete failure: rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/blog/dr_s...eal?urn=ncaaf,207140
Did you even read it? It states that he only failed to be known as \"the greatest player of all time\". But he will be regarded as one of them. I have no doubt. The article states, and I agree, that even if they were to finish 2nd in the polls this year, the year would be considered a failure.
To quote the article that you mis understood, \"Ah, yes: About those \"all time\" superlatives. Most decorated? Yes. Most competitive? Probably. Most respected? Arguably. Most popular? Clearly.
But greatest? That was what was on the line this season: Greatest College Football Player of All Time.
However, there was a single condition: Win the national championship. As I said here last week: Anything less than a championship would -- and should -- be considered a failure for Tebow, for Urban Meyer and for the team.\"