2013 UGA football - The positives

wlayton wrote: Hey averagedawg, CTG would be quick to point out that AU "only" had 323 net rushing yards against our D where MIZZ gave up 500 plus yards rushing.

Now.....doesn't that make you feel so much better?? .....................

Dead on wlayton. As many are now saying, no more room for excuses.

Buc wrote:

wlayton wrote: Hey averagedawg, CTG would be quick to point out that AU "only" had 323 net rushing yards against our D where MIZZ gave up 500 plus yards rushing.

Now.....doesn't that make you feel so much better?? .....................

Dead on wlayton. As many are now saying, no more room for excuses.

Hey Buc, we all know there is no more room for excuses but CTG still has a basket full......he'll run out eventually.....

Beating Spurrier & USC, my #1 positive

wlayton wrote: Hey averagedawg, CTG would be quick to point out that AU "only" had 323 net rushing yards against our D where MIZZ gave up 500 plus yards rushing.

Now.....doesn't that make you feel so much better?? .....................

only because we played them on grass. if it would of been on turf we would of given up 600+ :whistle:

ogredawg wrote:

wlayton wrote: Hey averagedawg, CTG would be quick to point out that AU "only" had 323 net rushing yards against our D where MIZZ gave up 500 plus yards rushing.

Now.....doesn't that make you feel so much better?? .....................

only because we played them on grass. if it would of been on turf we would of given up 600+ :whistle:

Lots of truth in that statement . . . .

ogredawg wrote:

wlayton wrote: Hey averagedawg, CTG would be quick to point out that AU "only" had 323 net rushing yards against our D where MIZZ gave up 500 plus yards rushing.

Now.....doesn't that make you feel so much better?? .....................

only because we played them on grass. if it would of been on turf we would of given up 600+ :whistle:

Scarey thought.... :ohmy: