no more talk of a new coach

sadlerdawg wrote: If any player, be it IC, or a senior, is having trouble adjusting to the hits in the SEC, then he should not be starting and getting the majority of the carries is all I'm saying. Can't have it both ways. Either he's "the Man", and the coaches are going to hang the game plan on him, or he has trouble getting used to getting his bell rung, in which case he should be the 8-10 carry relief back. If he's going to start, then he should finish. We're not talking about one game here, it's pretty much every game.

wlayton wrote:

sadlerdawg wrote: If any player, be it IC, or a senior, is having trouble adjusting to the hits in the SEC, then he should not be starting and getting the majority of the carries is all I'm saying. Can't have it both ways. Either he's "the Man", and the coaches are going to hang the game plan on him, or he has trouble getting used to getting his bell rung, in which case he should be the 8-10 carry relief back. If he's going to start, then he should finish. We're not talking about one game here, it's pretty much every game.

Well, actually the staff doesn't have any dang options BUT to play him. Who else we got???

wlayton wrote: Well, actually the staff doesn't have any dang options BUT to play him. Who else we got???

Wartdawg wrote: Unique situation here sadler...

Our plans to develop IC and transition him to a full time player over a period of time were thrown
out the window when King and Ealey left.

wlayton wrote: Exactly. As I said, not really any choice but to play him.