Nothing has changed folks

BulldogShannon wrote:

Man, lots of stuff.

1st, welcome BD2010, you'll love it here. Most times we agree, sometimes we do not, and it's all good. The main thing we all agree on is all of us on this site LOVE the dawgs. Even if we disagree on the remedy, we LOVE the dags.

2nd, I may be off base in saying this (don't mean to embarrass you Buc )but Buc is kinda like the elder statesman here.

3rd, I think it was Buc who sent the link of CMR's (ooops, love the new name-Dicht) presser; that was a joke; he really doesn't seem to care. How about saying "we sucked", ?????????.

4th, I really nthought after it was 7-0, we would blow them out b/c we looked great on defense; but leave it to Dicht, Boner and the rest to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

5th, Born2Be, WOW haven't heard that one; the last thing we need is a QB. Unfortunately, AM plays for a dumbass OC who doesn't know what a rollout is.

6th, Someone in this post suggested wait till after SC game to judge. I agree---this is the 3rd time I've said it in the past 24 hours: IF we beat SC and go to Atlanta, I will support bringing him back, MAYBE. IF we lose to SC, then we need change. Why? There is no way in hell that SC should be a better program than us; if they win the east back to back, that is inexcusable.

Hey BS, let's clean it up a bit, this forum is too classy for that.

DawgnLA wrote: I'm disappointed in the way we lost. Not that we lost.

That kind of sums it up for me. Never want to be on the short side of the points, hard to win every game, every season.

Goes to show what drinking the koolaid in the offseason does to ones sense of reality. This football team was gassed. I have been screaming to the high heaven that JTII was the second coming of (UGA football).

Remember last week that Garner was upset with our new found nose tackle. Apparently did not like his condition or practice habits. That was our clue, and I wondered about the quote at the time. Not wondering anymore. Just goes to show that 290 pounders that want to play football can kick the heck out of 350 pounders that think only size matters.

So, Tree is going to be out for some time. Is this one player all that we have on the defensive side of the ball?

As ogredawg said, those that want AM to sit, might get their wish, but it won't be because of bad play. He has been told to stay in the pocket. He did that and what happened, sacked six times and hurried all night.

Bobo and Richt being ex-quarterbacks have totally screwed this young players game up. They come back with the excuse that he holds the ball too long. OK, say that, keep the press off of your butts. Both of you were quick to say look at AM's touchdown to interception ratio as a Redshirt Freshman.

I seem to remember AM using his wheels to make much of that possible. We also had a receiver that not only knew how to get open, he caught the damn ball when thrown within a mile of his body. Just sayin' . . . .

The anger I have, has no words to describe. Mark Richt must go! I'm starting to think the only reason he's made it this long is because Adams can push him around. Does anyone else feel that way or am I way out in left field. If that's the case, Adams must go as well. I doubt there is a Dawg fan anywhere that would argue that one.

I know there are those who will disagree with me.
I say fire Richt right now and hire Butch Davis.

averagedawg wrote:

I know there are those who will disagree with me.
I say fire Richt right now and hire Butch Davis.

You have my vote.
Next comes the purity talk. Clean program is great, also winning football games is great.

Some time back I had asked the question on this board about Bobo and Grantham. Wondered how the two of them would play out coaching on opposite sides of the ball. Below is a blog that I often read, and Mike makes a lot of sense with his scribblings. Breaks the game down in segments that make sense, and back up what many of us think is wrong with the Richt/Bobo style of offense (or lack of). Simply out coached by Boise State. FACT.

dawgsbui2.com/content/bobo-and-grantham-not-same-page