1.) Chase Daniels (provided Mizzou wins the Big 12 championship game)
2.) Tim Tebow (a statistically phenomenal season, the likes of which may never be seen again in college football. Even though it's an individual award, your team should still have impressed during the regular season, and Florida's only quality win was against Tennessee. Say what you will about the Heisman should go to the most outstanding individual player (Tebow is) and not the best player on a national title contending team (Florida isn't), but the fact remains that individual feats are performed with one purpose in mind: to win championships. Who cares if someone puts up stellar numbers on a sorry team? Those stats should have meaning attached to them. I'm sorry, but a touchdown run late in the 4th when you're already down by 3 scores is not the same as a touchdown run late in the 4th that puts your team ahead and clinches a major bowl birth. Statistics have to be taken in context. I will never believe that throwing 3000 yards and 30TD passes for a 3 loss team when your stats really didn't help your team achieve any of its goals is the same as throwing 3000 yards and 30TD passes for an undefeated team that goes to the national championship game. The context in which stats are accumulated matters, and 3 losses and 3rd in the SEC East is not a context in which stats are relevant to Heisman consideration)
3.) Dennis Dixon (Tebow-lite. I think by now it should be obvious that without him, Oregon would be a 5-7 football team.)
