I went silent after the Bama game because I'm also numb to losing the big games. I haven't smoked the hopium since the 2012 SECCG. That pretty much took the hopium out of my pipe. (Which is a good thing, since Bama did it again, twice in recent years.)
Let me wear my tinfoil hat for a moment though. . .
SB IV may not have lost the game for us, but he sure didn't win it either. I could go on about that. BUT . . .
What happened to our defense? Are we really not that good? Is Alabama that great? I can't believe either of those are "yes".
Prior to the game, I predicted (elsewhere) that the SEC Commissioner, Sankey, wanted TWO teams in the CFP, not ONE. It DOUBLES the odds of the SEC having another Natty in it's possession. I predicted that he would want Bama to win, knowing that UGA would be in anyway. I predicted that UGA players and coaches would not really feel like killing themselves to win what would really amount to a totally meaningless game - win and you get to play Cincy, sure, but you also get to play the winner of Michigan/Bama anyway. Lose and you play Michigan, but you also play Bama again. Who cares? Why kill yourself over a meaningless conference championship game that doesn't help you at all if you win, and doesn't really hurt you if you lose? So I predicted Sankey would make a call to Kirby and wink and nod and we would lose that game. I'm not REALLY serious that that's what happened, but you know what? It may as well have been.
Our D didn't seem very aggressive AT ALL. Four man rushes against a Heisman QB seemed pretty lame, and the result shows it.
Anyway, thanks for allowing me my moment of insane conspiracy. Now for at least a sign of support from the gambling world. I don't EVER gamble. BUT . . . I am fascinated by the wild success of gamblers at predicting game outcomes and spreads. Here is an article that at least shows we haven't lost all respect in the game of college football:
www.espn.com/chalk/story/_/id/32800960/n...eorgia-michigan-line
Now back to my dark, depressing room, where I can ponder the weird habit we have of abandoning what works at QB and across the defense . . .