Forum
      

Suspensions and more

12 years 3 months ago #47790 by growl
Replied by growl on topic Re: Suspensions and more
With the suspension of a QB at sc maybe spurrier will shut up about UGA and mind his on business.

The sun shines on a different Dawg every day
The following user(s) said Thank You: wlayton

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
12 years 3 months ago #47795 by TN Dawg
Replied by TN Dawg on topic Re: Suspensions and more

growl wrote: With the suspension of a QB at sc maybe spurrier will shut up about UGA and mind his on business.


Don't hold your breath. He sill spin so that the player was not indoctrinated into his culture and too young to be held accountable. No big deal! He was just a little intoxicated. Never mind the fact that he is underage.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
12 years 3 months ago #47824 by thriller
Replied by thriller on topic Re: Suspensions and more
Would someone please read this and let me know if Rodney Garner is smoking crack? We only have 70 players - 15 below the limit - last I heard.

“I just think there has been some false reporting about how it all works. People were saying you could take a Penn State player and it would not count against you. That’s not true. It’s going to count against you. It’s going to count against your 85, it’s going to count against your initial 25. The only thing was, if you had 25 initials and you were at 85 this year and you took one, next year you had 24 initials and you had to be at 84. So it was bad reporting.

“We had to sit there with a number of kids we already had committed and felt good about and realize that if we took one it was going to take away from the number. So that’s the strategy when you look at how you go about about it. Everybody’s saying, ‘why didn’t Georgia take any, roster management, da, da, da.’ Well, it was going to affect what our wish would be if we get everything right for January and February by what we could take.

“Now there were a couple of guys we thought, ‘if we could get these two guys, that would offset and it would be fine.’ Now if they say you can take them and it doesn’t count against the 85 and not count against the 25, you could back count for it or allow it, you’d try to get all the seniors you could. But that’s not the way it was. Unfortunately, nobody’s come out and just said that. . . .The kids did not have to sit out, so it was not a penalty for the kids. But the program that takes them, you have to fit it into the number.”

So THAT'S why we didn't take any Penn State players?! It would "count against our '85'"?! WHAT 85?!

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
12 years 3 months ago #47826 by wlayton
Replied by wlayton on topic Re: Suspensions and more
Maybe they are thinking the next class is going to be huge.....(don't get it either)

PVBDAWG

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
12 years 3 months ago #47833 by wlayton
Replied by wlayton on topic Re: Suspensions and more
I asked "my guy".....wanted someone smarter than me to address his thoughts......see his comments below.


"I think Garner is referring to the fact that you can only take 25 people in a recruiting class. The PSU guys would have to be included in that number. I know the 85 number is not a problem, but they’re planning on maxing out the number of recruits they sign this year. I think it would have taken away from that."

He felt Garner was really addressing the 25 recruit per year rule.

PVBDAWG

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
12 years 3 months ago #47836 by thriller
Replied by thriller on topic Re: Suspensions and more
I was thinking that might be the "explanation". Bottom line is this: we're already saying, "just wait 'til next year". :(

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
Time to create page: 0.028 seconds