Forum
      

Richt to A&M

13 years 2 months ago #44191 by wlayton
Replied by wlayton on topic Re: Richt to A&M
The point of a "certain post" in this thread about Sumlin facing a good D in So. Miss is this.

1. UH has a good team that has faced NOBODY until So. Miss that actually HAS a D. If UGA played UH's schedule, they would average 50+ points per game too.
2. Sumlin is a very good coach but he's coming to the ultimate defensive league in the country and he's going to have his hands full. The So Miss D is pretty good but is not SEC good.
3. In my humble opinion, there is definitely a correlation between Sumlin and his teams facing great defenses, especially SEC D's.......trying my best to figure out why this wasn't figured out.;)

PVBDAWG

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
13 years 2 months ago #44192 by Buc
Replied by Buc on topic Re: Richt to A&M
wlayton, there you go AGAIN. Seems when anyone has a counter point with you, you can't figure out why they don't "think like you". Pretty simple actually, you and your "sources" always seem to produce the same information that anyone on this board can get from the AJC or many other "sources". Think that is not noticeable, check around.

What are your qualifications when speaking to the coaching habits or skills of Sumlin. You know this man. You are like the rest of the folks on this board, you know what you "read". As far as opinions, everyone has one, in some cases folks have more than one.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
13 years 2 months ago #44195 by wlayton
Replied by wlayton on topic Re: Richt to A&M
Buc, I don't know what I have done to piss you off but you have been on my case (subtle in many cases) for several weeks now and you can tell from my posts, I'm tired of the 5th grade playing posting games.

If I've offended you in any way, I certainly didn't realize it. I'm a big boy and have no problem apologizing. We've certainly had a good relationship in the past.

Qualifications???????.....we all THINK we are qualified but we aren't......including you.

Also, I only know what I read????? You are the ultimate poster of articles on this forum, so I guess you are reading more than anybody here on the forum. Nobody has any inside information and we all post what we hear and READ.....including you.

If you want to avoid me, fine.....I prefer personal interaction.

PVBDAWG

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
13 years 2 months ago #44197 by Buc
Replied by Buc on topic Re: Richt to A&M
Real simple wlayton, maybe you should think before you post some of your "one liners". As to the 5th grade comment, it has always been said to me that "it takes one to know one".

Appreciate the fact that you say you don't have any inside information.

I will put it this way. If you want to avoid me fine, works both ways.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
13 years 2 months ago - 13 years 2 months ago #44198 by wlayton
Replied by wlayton on topic Re: Richt to A&M
Takes one to know one?.....ok, guess we are both 5th graders......know I am at this point to be sitting here posting this stuff back and forth.

Buc, I'm entitled to MY opinions. You certainly don't have to agree with them.....but to criticize me about MY thoughts isn't called for. This is an OBJECTIVE forum.

If you don't want to accept my opology for whatever I did to piss you off, ok.......I'm sure I'll live and move on. Prefer to be friends though.


Oh, side note about inside information. If you are insinuating that "my info guy" was just ME reading things in the media, that isn't the case. My friend (which I will not divulge his name) is the cousin of Ray Goff and he occasionally gets his info from Ray......they talk alot and provides some tidbits.

PVBDAWG

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
13 years 2 months ago #44200 by Buc
Replied by Buc on topic Re: Richt to A&M
Buc, I'm entitled to MY opinions. You certainly don't have to agree with them.....but to criticize me about MY thoughts isn't called for. This is an OBJECTIVE forum.

Think about the above statement wlayton. This is an objective forum, for the most part. I challenge you to tell me here that you have not critisized others on this board, more than one time for sure. Was it called for. Come on wlayton, been around the block.

Where has it been said that you were not entitled to your opinions. If I critisize or question you I would call that OBJECTIVE. Don't get your feelings hurt, just do what you do best.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
Time to create page: 0.035 seconds