The Way It Is . . .UGA/AU

Wartdawg wrote:

Buc wrote:
Do want to say this . . . was really impressed with Conley last week. Young man is a gamer.

That's an understatement Buc.

Buc wrote: sadlerdawg, thought about you when I read TN Dawg's post. Guess he will have to get in line with the rest of us that you have requested from time to time to spell it out. He will have to take his licks like the rest of us I guess, know that he is a team player. . . . .

sadlerdawg wrote:

TN Dawg wrote: True NMSU was not a high calibre team, but I was impressed with the intensity UGA played with. They were focused on task at hand. Did 9 different players score? That is good.

Yes I too was impressed with CC. Still want to see OC get more catches. TK & AW played well. MB continues to a go to guy. He should have the name I gave Damian Gary....Money. However MM will be the difference maker.

Was also impressed with BH (except for fumble), and KK had some good hard runs. Getting full stable of horses back should help greatly. Like to see IC get pushed more for that starting job. I like our run O against their run D which ranks 10th in conference. I am a ball control kind of guy.

On D, I also think we will see more 4-3 lineups. Our key is to stop their run game and put it on the shoulders of their QB with their passing O that ranks 108th in country. This may be the game where our DBs have a pick-6.

But as you know with rivalry games, the team that looks best on paper does not always win. It will be the team with the most to lose/gain. And that is UGA. Go Dawgs!

May I propose an amendment to the dawgs.com constitution that, when referring to more than 2 players, you are not allowed to use initials. I practically needed the media guide to follow everyone in this post!!

Wartdawg wrote: IDK Sadler. It's SOP to now use NS when referring to these DGD's. Maybe in some cases the OP can FIFY to cut down the ZOMG factor. KTHX, BBFN.