- Posts: 10054
- Thank you received: 1252
southernlover wrote:
I understand and agree that Green is a deep threat, gamechanger, walks on water, etc. In the SEC if your team is that dependent on one player you need to stay in the locker room. Do you not think that Durham or King are deep threats? I just don't think that AM has developed the accuracy on his longer throws that we have become accustomed to in the past. I just believe that with a young quarterback you have to work on higher percentage tosses and staying away from the gimics.
UGA's top four receivers have had 30 catches through Saturday and the TE's have had 5.
Durham is not a deep threat in the manner he draws anything other than man coverage. King has proven inconsistent so he is disregarded largely until he make people worry about him.
Every team in the SEC is that dependent on one player. FOr some it is a QB. FOr others it is a WR. Alabama may be the lone exception with the two tailbacks, but they have not played anyone yet so who knows.
Without a homerun hitting WR defenses just crowd the line and take everything else away. This is a simple football principle and I am concerned people on this board seem unaware of it.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Without a homerun hitting WR defenses just crowd the line and take everything else away. This is a simple football principle and I am concerned people on this board seem unaware of it.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
kentdaddy wrote:
Without a homerun hitting WR defenses just crowd the line and take everything else away. This is a simple football principle and I am concerned people on this board seem unaware of it.
No reason for concern, KD. Speaking for myself, and some others on the board may be trying to convey the same message but it's just getting lost in translation, is this--I agree, Green is a game changer and difference maker ( or is that Heart breaker and life taker, but I digress) and causes defenses to change their philosophy. I get that, and I agree with you. My point, and maybe some of the others, is concern that we have NOBODY else that can step up and become somewhat of a difference maker. We've recruited some terrific wideouts out of high school, they need to man up. It is shameful to me that this team is so much worse without AJ playing. That's where our disagreement comes in-- I don't disagree with your assessment, I just can't believe that our coaches can't rectify the situation to even a manageable degree.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
KD, I to understand where you are coming from, but me like some of the others do not believe this is a one man team. I get what you are saying about double coverage ect, but man what are we going to do next year and the next. Are you saying we will not win without AJ. I like some of the others wish AJ would have been kicked off the team, then lets see where we go from there. He is selfish and I don't want him coming back and us starting to win and him get the big head and say see you can't win without me.
Duck
Please Log in to join the conversation.