Simply Put...

fire_dawg wrote:

HAPPY/sadlerdawg, I agree 100% about the venting. Its just a natural human reaction. I have full comfidence that CTG will make the right changes to get us back to junkyard dawgs of ole. Its just some habits are hard to break (arm tackling). To tell you the truth, I cant wait until Sat. so I can get this bitter taste out of my mouth.

fire_dawg, I too am confident CTG will do what he can to fire up the D. Like Buc said, I only see one major flaw, and I hope CMR takes care of it (not by firing, by taking over). Hint--it has nothing to do with Defense!!

The truth is SC wanted it more.
We were not the more physical team.

Thanks for the responses dawg friends whether negative or positive. My head has returned normal body temp finally. I really thought it was going to spin off of my neck and fly into outer space. It's still spinning a little though. Yall have to understand that I have to live around those chickens. Heck, they're already talking about being NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP bound.
I say they go 8-5. Enough about that.

Looking forward to killing a few hawgs now.

Here's what I would like to see for improvement from this point forward.
First, I want to see a LOT more enthusiasum and fire from every player.
Second, I want to see someone else calling the offensive plays. Good luck there huh.
Third, I want to see improved performance from the OL.
Forth, I want to see wrap up tackles. Hell, head-on collisions would be even better. Not flag football.
Fifth, better coverage from the DBs deep.
Sixth, a little more effort in our running game. The third bullet above should help some here.

As always. GO DAWGS!!!!

Thanks for the welcome Buc & wlayton. Sorry I didn't quote the item on the thread and that you had to go back to find what I was talking about. I've been a bystander on the site for quite a while and really enjoy the rational threads. I'll chime in from time to time when I can be relevant. Go Dogs!

barkndog wrote:

Thanks for the welcome Buc & wlayton. Sorry I didn't quote the item on the thread and that you had to go back to find what I was talking about. I've been a bystander on the site for quite a while and really enjoy the rational threads. I'll chime in from time to time when I can be relevant. Go Dogs!

I do not believe relevance is a prerequisite.

kentdaddy wrote:

barkndog wrote:

Thanks for the welcome Buc & wlayton. Sorry I didn't quote the item on the thread and that you had to go back to find what I was talking about. I've been a bystander on the site for quite a while and really enjoy the rational threads. I'll chime in from time to time when I can be relevant. Go Dogs!

I do not believe relevance is a prerequisite.