I have major problems with this thread. Here they are:
1) USC always plays us tough. We were never supposed to dominate them. I was uneasy about my prediction of 31-17, because let's face it, we never have a good offensive day against them. In the Richt era, the rule is, we score an offensive touchdown, we win. Period. We did, we won. Period.
2) No one is going to scream that we are overrated. This was a conference game on an opponent's home field in the SEC against a national title winning coach. It is a win against the #1-rated defense in the SEC. We beat them by a touchdown. You have a problem with winning?
3) This was a defensive struggle, and I'm proud of the way our D stepped up. You know, without Jeff Owens and without Marcus Washington, in our first conference game, we held SCarolina to only 7 points. We forced a fumble in the end zone and ended the game on an interception. I have no problem with that. Nobody had a problem with beating Tech 14-7 to wrap up the 2005 SEC Championship season, did they?
4) Tripp Chandler had this exact same game against USC last year. I'm not ready to bury the kid yet. Maybe we start Bruce Figgins against ASU, get Tripp worried about keeping his job. But there's no reason to trash him. Remember, he saved our butts against Vandy last year and caught what turned out to be the game-winning TD against Mississippi State in 2006. He's not useless.
There is no reason to trash the Dawgs after a win. It disgusts me, it is not appropriate for this board -- nor is the language, by the way -- and in the end, who cares what the rest of the country thinks? They can't take away our undefeated record; only we can do that.
Go Dawgs. Period. The end.
Red and Black, Win or Lose