Game day UGA/GA SOUTHERN EAGLES

Speaking of watching the game last night . . . a thought hit me while I was watching the "highlights" (if that is what they can be loosely called) . . .

Jacob Eason = Greyson Lambert. I honestly couldn't see ANY difference.

I'm not sure that's a fair assessment and I am not going to say anything about Eason, but I will equate the probable results. As long as Richt is there, we will probably have about the same team results.

I think the descent from Murray to Mason to Lambert has demonstrated that a good QB can win games, a mediocre QB can lose games, and a bad QB will lose games. Murray played on a team with arguably more weaknesses than this year or last year (D, OL), but not only managed to win some big games, but pulled several out of thin air, and would have done the same with aub absent toddy's secondary's faux pas of the century.

Eason may or may not be a good QB. But it is clear that having a mediocre or bad QB is only a symptom of deeper problems. Thought experiment: "would Eason be a better/worse QB playing for CMR or playing for [fill in the blank]".

Sadly, the answer is obvious to most fans.

Good read rockdawg.

Murray to Mason to Lambert shows there is something significantly wrong with either Richt's recruiting, his ability to evaluate talent, or both.

Absolutely ridiculous and unforgivable for someone whose calling card is supposed to be QB guru and master recruiter.

Wartdawg wrote: Murray to Mason to Lambert shows there is something significantly wrong with either Richt's recruiting, his ability to evaluate talent, or both.

Absolutely ridiculous and unforgivable for someone whose calling card is supposed to be QB guru and master recruiter.

Could not move away from the post above, returned several times.

What Wartdawg said has been said before. What I like is the fact that he (Wartdawg) is not going to allow the same blogging going on elsewhere without the "other side" being stated. High Fives.

Add to the above.

Some mention has been made about "who" plays. Until the entire defensive coaching staff was replaced, everything under the Richt command remained the same. Down my way there have been rumblings of "teacher's pets".

While that might sound a bit off base, can't help but look at choices made, and that goes back to what Wartdawg said. Who is making those quarterback choices, and that also includes "scholarships".

Keep up the good fight Wartdawg, past time for the "minority" to whip what those in the "majority" for so many years have not understood.

Rate Mark Richt and his performance as head coach since . . . . any year you choose.

For those in the media, we know that you read Dawgs.com. Simple electronics, you can't hide. Don't "hide", you are invited to this discussion. Most of you never having played in the "Arena", that is ok, come up and be as open as you are on the "pay for play" folks that you work for. Cox being one. M&M being another, and there are many more. IMG and on and on.