After the Michigan scrimmage (let's face it, that's what it was . . . did you see the size and speed difference? Incredible!), I saw that the Dawgs were installed as 2.5 point favorites, and as of this writing, the spread is currently 3 points. This means gamblers LIKE Georgia being the favorite! I was BAFFLED (as I usually am by Vegas). This time I had to know what was going on.
So I called a friend of mine who gambles a fair amount (I do not EVER gamble). I asked him what the casinos are thinking - are they NUTS?!
Bob's answer was enlightening. He asked me:
1. Who had more at stake in the SECCG, Bama or Georgia? Answer: Bama BY FAR. Lose and GO HOME (er - to a New Year's Day bowl game). For Georgia, lose and just be playing someone else in the CFP. Conference titles, as Bama has shown us BEFORE, are MEANINGLESS. Now BOTH teams have their backs against the wall, and Georgia - believe it or not - has the more athletic team.
2. What was the potential DOWNSIDE of a Bama win for Bama, versus a Georgia win for Georgia? I was a little confused by the question. As he explained, Bama had ALL CHIPS IN THE MIDDLE OF THE TABLE. What happened to Metchie shows you the potential DOWNSIDE of being in Bama's position. Georgia sure didn't want THAT. In other words, the risk for Bama in giving it EVERYTHING was getting a star like Metchie injured, but the win made the "sacrifice" "worth it". For Georgia, winning the SEC would have put someone else in the playoffs - like Oklahoma State or Notre Dame - either of which (at that TIME) may have been a TOUGHER out than Bama. And losing a star player would REALLY HAVE SUCKED. I pointed out that the Metchie injury could have happened to Georgia, but he claims that's not the point - the point is that Bama was willing to give it EVERYTHING, and ANYTHING. Georgia, like it or not, was NOT. (This logic MAY explain why our foot came off the pedal in the second half in the Orange Bowl - do NOT get injured for meaningless points? I dunno.)
3. Seven of Bama's points in the SECCG came on a pick 6. If Stumpy Stetson had thrown to the CORRECT receiver on that play (Jermaine Burton, on the outside - had his man badly beaten), it would have been 6 points the OTHER WAY. That's a 14 point turnaround. It was "only" a 17 point final margin.
4. The OTHER INT in the game was not The Hobbit's fault - something I hate to admit is true. It was, of all people, Brock Bower's fault for inexplicably stopping on his route - AT THE ALABAMA 10 FREAKING YARD LINE. There's 7 more points, right there.
5. And finally, as he pointed out to me, Georgia's win over Michigan was much more impressive than Bama's win over Cincy, like it or not. Sure, Bama beat a double digit spread, but Georgia SLAUGHTERED a 7.5 point spread. Even casinos that had Georgia as 10 point favorites were shocked at how easy that was. The eye test means a lot to gamblers.
So, according to Bob, Bama's win in the SECCG is actually just keeping the spread DOWN. (Some think the REAL spread should be closer to 7.5, which he thinks is why the spread has actually gone up slightly.)
I have to admit - I'm STILL BAFFLED. With Georgia at -140 and Bama at +120, that's a HUGE differential, all things considered! But as I pointed out to a BUNCH of Michigan trolls, who gave us ZERO chance against "Big Blue", casinos don't make their money being WRONG.