The reason why there is more said about the coaches when things go bad on the field is really simple. You don't get praised for doing what you are supposed to do, but it is pointed out when you don't.
My kids have to make their beds. It's part of their J-O-B-S in my house as children. When they are merely doing what they are supposed to do, I don't jump up and down and praise them for making their bed quite as much as I point it out to them when they fail to do that.
I have tasks to do at my job... requirements. No one praises me for just doing the daily requirements of the job, but it would be quickly pointed out if I didn't.
I'm not going to jump up and down and backslap as I high five the coaches when they merely show they are competent at their job. We had shizztons more talent than Louisville... we just did what we are supposed to do. We were the favored team so it's not like we waltzed in and upset Alabama.
When coaches go up and above normal and do spectacular things, we do praise them. We've praised CJP... we've praised CWF. We've noted Bobo he called good games. We praise when there is evidence of something praiseworthy, but again... just "not screwing up" is called competency and rarely do people get praised merely for being competent.
I guess though with Richt, it might be in order for us to start two or three threads about how awesome he was for not calling for a pooch kick that cost us the game, or for not screwing up the timeout situation. Then again... he didn't face a situation where he could have screwed it up in one of those two ways. So here's to you Richt for not being put into a crucial spot where you had to make a big decision. Since you did what was expected of you when you took the job, here have a raise.
I wish I got raises and heaps of praise every time I displayed competency, but that's just not how it works.
God Bless and Go Dawgs
Like Braves Baseball? Follow them at ourbraves.freeforums.net/ and help support my community of Braves fans.