- Posts: 1608
- Thank you received: 976
Kunena Menu
29 or 9
- thriller
- Offline
- Junk Yard Dawg
Less
More
12 years 5 months ago #52121
by thriller
Replied by thriller on topic Re: 29 or 9
Good thread.
Man, I REALLY, REALLY hate to say this, but . . . I wouldn't take either one of them as a linebacker. And I would take either one of them as a safety. They're just too small and get pushed around too easily. The last four games they played made me take a different view of them. Ga. Southern pushed them around, Ga. Tech ran on them too easily, Alabama made them look terrible, and Nebraska continually drove them backwards.
Don't get me wrong! I'd take them, because they are stud athletes. I just have a slightly different take on them now - if I ran an offensive scheme against them, I'd do what 'Bama did - run RIGHT AT THEM.
Man, I REALLY, REALLY hate to say this, but . . . I wouldn't take either one of them as a linebacker. And I would take either one of them as a safety. They're just too small and get pushed around too easily. The last four games they played made me take a different view of them. Ga. Southern pushed them around, Ga. Tech ran on them too easily, Alabama made them look terrible, and Nebraska continually drove them backwards.
Don't get me wrong! I'd take them, because they are stud athletes. I just have a slightly different take on them now - if I ran an offensive scheme against them, I'd do what 'Bama did - run RIGHT AT THEM.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Dawg With Style
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Buc
-
- Offline
- Junk Yard Dawg
Less
More
- Posts: 14391
- Thank you received: 8531
12 years 5 months ago #52122
by Buc
Replied by Buc on topic Re: 29 or 9
thriller, kind of goes along with what wlayton mentioned yesterday. Suggested that #9 would be a serious safety. Your points point to the truth. Good post.

Please Log in to join the conversation.
- wlayton
- Offline
- Junk Yard Dawg
Less
More
- Posts: 10054
- Thank you received: 1252
12 years 5 months ago #52124
by wlayton
You know Buc, Thomas Davis was VERY similar to Tree (imo).....believe he made it at outside LB with the Panthers didn't he? Will be interesting to see if they move Tree back to safety....has the speed.
PVBDAWG
Replied by wlayton on topic Re: 29 or 9
Buc wrote: thriller, kind of goes along with what wlayton mentioned yesterday. Suggested that #9 would be a serious safety. Your points point to the truth. Good post.
You know Buc, Thomas Davis was VERY similar to Tree (imo).....believe he made it at outside LB with the Panthers didn't he? Will be interesting to see if they move Tree back to safety....has the speed.
PVBDAWG
The following user(s) said Thank You: thriller
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Buc
-
- Offline
- Junk Yard Dawg
Less
More
- Posts: 14391
- Thank you received: 8531
12 years 5 months ago #52125
by Buc
Replied by Buc on topic Re: 29 or 9
One thing for sure in the NFL wlayton, teams going more and more for that "bad" safety. Would not be too surprised if we have a "bad" freshman safety in Athens.
Closing speed for Ogletree was/is scary. Say again, would love to see Alec align himself with someone that will guarantee him a future when football is over. I think like that.
Closing speed for Ogletree was/is scary. Say again, would love to see Alec align himself with someone that will guarantee him a future when football is over. I think like that.

Please Log in to join the conversation.
- wlayton
- Offline
- Junk Yard Dawg
Less
More
- Posts: 10054
- Thank you received: 1252
12 years 5 months ago #52126
by wlayton
PVBDAWG
Replied by wlayton on topic Re: 29 or 9
and he should think that way too.
Yes, really looking foward to TM at safety as well!! :woohoo: :woohoo:
Yes, really looking foward to TM at safety as well!! :woohoo: :woohoo:
PVBDAWG
The following user(s) said Thank You: thriller
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- thriller
- Offline
- Junk Yard Dawg
Less
More
- Posts: 1608
- Thank you received: 976
12 years 5 months ago #52127
by thriller
Sounds like the Dawgs may have another in what has become a LONG line of ugly, smash-mouth, hit you HARD, NASTY-WASTY safeties. Almost brings a tear to my eye.
Replied by thriller on topic Re: 29 or 9
wlayton wrote: and he should think that way too.
Yes, really looking foward to TM at safety as well!! :woohoo: :woohoo:
Sounds like the Dawgs may have another in what has become a LONG line of ugly, smash-mouth, hit you HARD, NASTY-WASTY safeties. Almost brings a tear to my eye.


Please Log in to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.267 seconds