- Thank you received: 0
Kunena Menu
South Carolina "In-Game" comments thread
- Mike Honcho
- New Member
Less
More
12 years 11 months ago #49451
by Mike Honcho
Replied by Mike Honcho on topic Re: South Carolina "In-Game" comments thread
Don't agree...when you have constant pressure from the outside you go for quick hits...three step drops, shallow crossing routes from the slot, TE chips and then quick outs in the flat, designed QB draws (especially with an athlete like Murray) maybe some is to be blamed on checks Murray made at the line, but that's still a coaching problem. We didn't adapt to what they were doing to our line...there are quick strike plays to counter a strong front four. All I saw was an unsuccessful running game combined with overthrown deep balls by a QB who was hearing footsteps all night.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- SouthernDawg
-
- Offline
- Junk Yard Dawg
Less
More
- Posts: 918
- Thank you received: 1567
12 years 11 months ago - 12 years 11 months ago #49452
by SouthernDawg
In other news, dog bites owner.
Wow, noise was a huge factor? There's a real newsworthy tweet in SEC football; noise. That's why we lost the game apparently boys, because noise was too much of a factor. Apparently if we go outside of the hedges, noise will lose the game for us. I wonder if other teams have to play in noise too or if it's just Georgia?
Replied by SouthernDawg on topic Re: South Carolina "In-Game" comments thread
WoodstockDawg wrote: Interesting quote off of Twitter.....Noise a huge factor.”
In other news, dog bites owner.
Wow, noise was a huge factor? There's a real newsworthy tweet in SEC football; noise. That's why we lost the game apparently boys, because noise was too much of a factor. Apparently if we go outside of the hedges, noise will lose the game for us. I wonder if other teams have to play in noise too or if it's just Georgia?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- wlayton
- Offline
- Junk Yard Dawg
Less
More
- Posts: 10054
- Thank you received: 1252
12 years 11 months ago #49453
by wlayton
PVBDAWG
Replied by wlayton on topic Re: South Carolina "In-Game" comments thread
Imo, domination to THAT degree......it wouldn't have mattered WHAT you called.
AM tried some short routes, 2 tipped with one intercepted. Clowney and Taylor were in his face all night.....Clowney was freakin hurdling our blockers to get to Murray.
Man among boys....play them 10 times, we lose 10 times.
AM tried some short routes, 2 tipped with one intercepted. Clowney and Taylor were in his face all night.....Clowney was freakin hurdling our blockers to get to Murray.
Man among boys....play them 10 times, we lose 10 times.
PVBDAWG
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- Mike Honcho
- New Member
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
12 years 11 months ago #49454
by Mike Honcho
Can't say I disagree mayor...just wish I would've seen more adjustments. I can live with being beat on the field...I can't live with being exposed on the field AND in the coaches box.
Replied by Mike Honcho on topic Re: South Carolina "In-Game" comments thread
wlayton wrote: Imo, domination to THAT degree......it wouldn't have mattered WHAT you called.
AM tried some short routes, 2 tipped with one intercepted. Clowney and Taylor were in his face all night.....Clowney was freakin hurdling our blockers to get to Murray.
Man among boys....play them 10 times, we lose 10 times.
Can't say I disagree mayor...just wish I would've seen more adjustments. I can live with being beat on the field...I can't live with being exposed on the field AND in the coaches box.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- WoodstockDawg
-
- Offline
- Bull Dawg
Less
More
- Posts: 214
- Thank you received: 56
12 years 11 months ago - 12 years 11 months ago #49455
by WoodstockDawg
No the point I really fou d interesting was that AM was tipping the snap. Read all of it....
Edit: We lost, because they were better tonight, and had a better game plan.
Replied by WoodstockDawg on topic Re: South Carolina "In-Game" comments thread
SouthernDawg wrote:
WoodstockDawg wrote: Interesting quote off of Twitter.....Noise a huge factor.”
In other news, dog bites owner.
Wow, noise was a huge factor? There's a real newsworthy tweet in SEC football; noise. That's why we lost the game apparently boys, because noise was too much of a factor. Apparently if we go outside of the hedges, noise will lose the game for us. I wonder if other teams have to play in noise too or if it's just Georgia?
No the point I really fou d interesting was that AM was tipping the snap. Read all of it....
Edit: We lost, because they were better tonight, and had a better game plan.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- kentdaddy
-
- Offline
- Junk Yard Dawg
Less
More
- Posts: 11976
- Thank you received: 594
12 years 11 months ago #49456
by kentdaddy
Replied by kentdaddy on topic Re: South Carolina "In-Game" comments thread
Of course there is a coaching problem. Mark Richt is soft. When the leader is soft the followers are soft. This game was similar to the 'Bama game from 2008. It was clear which team was well coached and which was not.
We can look back in five years and see UGA will have many more NFL players from these teams. The difference is capable coaching. Richt will never win.
We can look back in five years and see UGA will have many more NFL players from these teams. The difference is capable coaching. Richt will never win.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.268 seconds