Forum
      

South Carolina "In-Game" comments thread

12 years 1 month ago #49451 by Mike Honcho
Replied by Mike Honcho on topic Re: South Carolina "In-Game" comments thread
Don't agree...when you have constant pressure from the outside you go for quick hits...three step drops, shallow crossing routes from the slot, TE chips and then quick outs in the flat, designed QB draws (especially with an athlete like Murray) maybe some is to be blamed on checks Murray made at the line, but that's still a coaching problem. We didn't adapt to what they were doing to our line...there are quick strike plays to counter a strong front four. All I saw was an unsuccessful running game combined with overthrown deep balls by a QB who was hearing footsteps all night.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Mike Honcho
  • Visitor
12 years 1 month ago - 12 years 1 month ago #49452 by SouthernDawg
Replied by SouthernDawg on topic Re: South Carolina "In-Game" comments thread

WoodstockDawg wrote: Interesting quote off of Twitter.....Noise a huge factor.”


In other news, dog bites owner.

Wow, noise was a huge factor? There's a real newsworthy tweet in SEC football; noise. That's why we lost the game apparently boys, because noise was too much of a factor. Apparently if we go outside of the hedges, noise will lose the game for us. I wonder if other teams have to play in noise too or if it's just Georgia?

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
12 years 1 month ago #49453 by wlayton
Replied by wlayton on topic Re: South Carolina "In-Game" comments thread
Imo, domination to THAT degree......it wouldn't have mattered WHAT you called.

AM tried some short routes, 2 tipped with one intercepted. Clowney and Taylor were in his face all night.....Clowney was freakin hurdling our blockers to get to Murray.

Man among boys....play them 10 times, we lose 10 times.

PVBDAWG

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
12 years 1 month ago #49454 by Mike Honcho
Replied by Mike Honcho on topic Re: South Carolina "In-Game" comments thread

wlayton wrote: Imo, domination to THAT degree......it wouldn't have mattered WHAT you called.

AM tried some short routes, 2 tipped with one intercepted. Clowney and Taylor were in his face all night.....Clowney was freakin hurdling our blockers to get to Murray.

Man among boys....play them 10 times, we lose 10 times.


Can't say I disagree mayor...just wish I would've seen more adjustments. I can live with being beat on the field...I can't live with being exposed on the field AND in the coaches box.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Mike Honcho
  • Visitor
12 years 1 month ago - 12 years 1 month ago #49455 by WoodstockDawg
Replied by WoodstockDawg on topic Re: South Carolina "In-Game" comments thread

SouthernDawg wrote:

WoodstockDawg wrote: Interesting quote off of Twitter.....Noise a huge factor.”


In other news, dog bites owner.

Wow, noise was a huge factor? There's a real newsworthy tweet in SEC football; noise. That's why we lost the game apparently boys, because noise was too much of a factor. Apparently if we go outside of the hedges, noise will lose the game for us. I wonder if other teams have to play in noise too or if it's just Georgia?


No the point I really fou d interesting was that AM was tipping the snap. Read all of it....

Edit: We lost, because they were better tonight, and had a better game plan.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
12 years 1 month ago #49456 by kentdaddy
Replied by kentdaddy on topic Re: South Carolina "In-Game" comments thread
Of course there is a coaching problem. Mark Richt is soft. When the leader is soft the followers are soft. This game was similar to the 'Bama game from 2008. It was clear which team was well coached and which was not.

We can look back in five years and see UGA will have many more NFL players from these teams. The difference is capable coaching. Richt will never win.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
Time to create page: 0.038 seconds