- Posts: 14391
- Thank you received: 8531
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Thanks so much for that post, Buc.
Those who know my posts on here know that the thing that sticks most in my craw is the '46 \"Army/ND split\" of the national championship. Forget the fact that both Army and ND had tied a game that year. Georgia won more games AND the bowl game. There was a definite bias.
I'll stop fuming. The evidence is above. I think the University (which, classily, does not claim either the '27 NC given us by the Boand and Poling polls -- we lost to Tech -- or the '68 NC -- Vince's first! -- that was given to us by the Litkenhaus poll) should seriously claim the 1946 National Championship. We should fly that flag up there with the '42 and '80 flags in the horseshoe and let everyone know who the best damn dawgs in all of college football were that year!
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
I honestly think that the main reason that Georgia did not get more consideration for the 46 national championship is because it was the first football season after the end of WWII. It was the first time in several years that college football could actually be the most important thing on people's minds again, and they wanted to give the title to \"America's Team.\" The fact that the school representing our boys (Army) and the school representing the country's largest religious denomination (Notre Dame) were in the thick of the title hunt made for a storybook season and the chance to crown a champion that would help to unite America in the wake of tragedy. Army and Notre Dame's tie that season was against each other in what, up to that point, was the game of the century. Having them split the title honored the nation's GIs and its faith.
Please Log in to join the conversation.