Forum
      

Really Dawgs WHY????

14 years 6 months ago #30124 by wlayton
Replied by wlayton on topic Re:Really Dawgs WHY????
sadlerdawg wrote:

KD, I imagine WE is scared of the coaches, but he didn't want to stick around for the police either, and I'm guessing it's because of this--

from ajc.com:
Separately, Athens-Clarke County Municipal Court Clerk Rhonda Bolton told the AJC that the court issued a failure-to-appear warrant for Ealey on Aug. 12. Ealey was charged with speeding and tag violations on May 30, she said, and failed to appear for a scheduled court date on July 12. That failure to appear triggered a suspension of Ealey’s driver’s license, Bolton said.



oopsie

PVBDAWG

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
14 years 6 months ago #30125 by DawgnLA
Replied by DawgnLA on topic Re:Really Dawgs WHY????
Wasn't he the one that took a bus for a joyride in high school too?

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
14 years 6 months ago #30126 by Buc
Replied by Buc on topic Re:Really Dawgs WHY????
Also have to go along with Malcome getting some snaps this season. KM is also T. J. Stripling's first cousin. Ken was rated four star if that means anything. Know that he is one tough dude.

One thing these young backs do not like, and that is not playing on game day. I said one game earlier, looking at the record, WE, I am afraid is going to be an example, and as much as I hate that, think it is necessary.

Seems as if Carolina is having problems also. Suspensions on both sides could prove to be costly to both schools. Damn.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
14 years 6 months ago #30127 by DawgnLA
Replied by DawgnLA on topic Re:Really Dawgs WHY????
I wonder if there will be any thoughts to bringing Richard Samuel back to offensive side of the ball if the punishment for WE is severe and costs him several games or his career?

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
14 years 6 months ago #30128 by Buc
Replied by Buc on topic Re:Really Dawgs WHY????
Looking more and more like a lot of two tight end sets. That is not all bad either.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
14 years 6 months ago #30131 by wlayton
Replied by wlayton on topic Re:Really Dawgs WHY????
DawgnLA wrote:

I wonder if there will be any thoughts to bringing Richard Samuel back to offensive side of the ball if the punishment for WE is severe and costs him several games or his career?



I don't think he will miss but one game anyway and Samuel, imo, isn't the answer. I would play the freshman Malcome. Tough kid that's about 6'0" 220 lbs. as well that ACTUALLY has some moves where Samuel has none. You still have CK, Thomas and Malcome. WE will be back for USC (hopefully).

PVBDAWG

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
Time to create page: 0.065 seconds