Fanatic: n.
A person marked or motivated by an extreme, unreasoning enthusiasm, as for a cause.
Or a team.
Unreasoning is key. There is nothing that is or isn't out when it comes to being a fanatic. I happen to think that either there is a great misunderstanding about what it is to be a fan, or that criticism aimed at \"unreasonableness\" is simply a deflection from the real problem with a specific cause.
Or team.
I'm a fanatic. I'm a Georgia Bulldog fanatic and if there is a more unreasonable, passionate cause in the world, I don't know what it is. I came to Georgia during the Dooley years of the late 80s, suffered all the way through Jim Donnan, and finally landed upon the era of Mark Richt.
Mark Richt has given the Dawgs a reason for high expectations, but also fuel for unreasoning expectations. Anybody who understands what it is to love the Dawgs would never question the rise and fall of emotions that accompanies fanatics through the fall. We want to win. When we win, we glow. When we lose, we growl. It's that simple. Some of us growl louder than others. Some criticize the coaches, some the players, and some both. Seldom do we give credit to the opponent; it's just not done. We win because we were better. We lose because we beat ourselves. If there's any other explanation that fits the mentality of the \"fanatic\" then I don't know what it is.
It's that simple.
I write the \"Section 109\" bits as a form of catharsis for what I feel after games. That was where I saw most of my games while attending UGA. It's where I was introduced to Herschel, Larry, and Lewis. It's where a kid from England learned to appreciate southern accents, southern women, and Georgia football. Georgia is where I lost my love of fish and chips and found grits and cornbread and Popeye's fried chicken. I happen to feel that my wayward stork got blown off course. I was meant for Athens, not the Cotswolds, but I'm better for both experiences. I cannot separate my love for the Dawgs from the passion such love requires. When the Dawgs beat Auburn to make it to the SEC championship game, I was higher than a kite. They could have kicked kittens instead of extra points and I'd have defended it to the end. Today is the opposite of that feeling. I don't care if the team that played today finds a cure for world hunger on the way home, I'm pissed and I'm not going to hide it.
But I'll be back next week. Why? Simply because I'm a Georgia Bulldog fanatic. This team is like my kids. I'll forgive them anything they do, but don't expect me to be quiet in the process of forgiveness.
So it comes to this that today there was criticism of the reactions of fans on the site to the dismal play of the Dawgs. To whit I say \"so what?\" It's not the griping, critical fan who is the problem. I'll promise you that every one of THOSE fans will die a Dawg. Remember, we're unreasoning. Try to make sense of that and you might as well try to teach the world Quechua (it's a nearly dead language, btw.)
Fanatics feel every victory, every defeat, as thought we were playing on the field. It is so very far from the truth to say that we don't know anything because we might never have played a down. It is the very essence of the fanatic that, at our core, we are lifted higher or beaten down by the outcomes of the games. It's passion defined. Remember what T. Roosevelt said?
\"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though chequered by failure, than to take rank with those poor souls who neither enjoy much nor suffer much, because they live in the grey twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat.\"
We know victory and defeat, and we suffer much and enjoy much because of it. We dare entertain the idea of a national championship every year. We are Fanatics.
Can you imagine the team whose fans never complain? It's like a nation whose populace never rises up against tyranny, or a victim who remains silent out of fear. All these things carry the common outcome of having nothing change. In this we exchange unreasoning for madness, and it is unacceptable.
It might come as a shock to some here, but fanaticss are the single most important component of any team. Why? Simply because if the fanatics didn't come to games, there would be no games. Bite off a piece of THAT reasoning, chew it a while, and taste the flavor of truth.
Or prove me wrong with a counter point.
But never, under any circumstance, criticize the passion of the fan base. We don't have to play football to know a stinker when we see one, despite Joe Cox's contention that our opinions don't count. If it wasn't for the love of the Dawg fan, there would be no reason to come to Georgia to play football. We earned the right to call out players and coaches when we decided to dedicate ourselves to the finest institution of higher learning anywhere. It's rent for our passion and conviction, and we expect it to be paid in full on demand. Joe Cox claims to love the school, but would Joe Cox give up his spot for the betterment of the team? No, not voluntarily. Yet supposedly, Joe Cox has more insight into what it is to be a Dawg fan than I do, some how his point of view carries more weight than those of the thousands of fans who just witnessed one of the poorest performances from anyone wearing that uniform in the past 20 years. And please, correct me on that if you disagree. I pick on Joe because I've realized that he doesn't get the fans, and because it is his burden to bear as the leader of our Dawgs. He sees us as an annoyance, yet unimportant. I suggested we wear brown paper bags as a tangible show of our displeasure, yet that comment brought out the boo-birds moreso than Joe's performance today. There are fans who don't get it, either.
Still, next week I'll be cheering on the Dawgs, hoping for a win. We don't bet on the same horse if it loses every race. We don't vote for politicians who get caught with their pants down. We fire our employees for poor performance. Yet when it comes to the Dawgs, we always, always come back. Why? Can you explain it? It's unreasonable.
It's called \"fanatic.\"
"The freedom of individuals to verbally to oppose or to challenge police actions without thereby risking arrest is one of the principal characteristics by which we distinguish a free nation from a police state."