Forum
      

Why don't Richt try cox at Q.B.?

17 years 5 months ago #1646 by UnderDog37
Replied by UnderDog37 on topic Re: Why don't Richt try cox at Q.B.?
Yes, I saw those concerns about next year's team as well. You're right, we might have another year that's sub-par, but I hope it wont be as ugly as this one has been. On the other hand, who knows? We might be just as good as we once were if the problems we have this year work themselves out. We won't know until the first game of 07 is played.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • UnderDog37
  • Visitor
17 years 5 months ago #1648 by wlayton
Replied by wlayton on topic Re: Why don't Richt try cox at Q.B.?
Mark traditionally won't go the JUCO route and get some experienced OL, but he may have to this off season. We have some good OL in the wings but are so young and inexperienced. '08 looks great.

PVBDAWG

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
17 years 5 months ago #1681 by UnderDog37
Replied by UnderDog37 on topic Re: Why don't Richt try cox at Q.B.?
Actually, one of the best O-linemen we are looking at for 07 is in JUCO, and CMR admitted this in the paper last week. He sed he didnt like JUCO recruiting, but that it might be necessary to bolster the o-line for next season.....

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • UnderDog37
  • Visitor
17 years 5 months ago #1685 by wlayton
Replied by wlayton on topic Re: Why don't Richt try cox at Q.B.?
UnderDog37, I certainly hope he does go the JUCO route to get a couple of experienced OL.

PVBDAWG

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
17 years 5 months ago #1690 by UnderDog37
Replied by UnderDog37 on topic Re: Why don't Richt try cox at Q.B.?
I forget the man's name that CMR is looking at, but I believe he is a 6 foot 8 320 pound tackle from GMC or Virginia Hargrave.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • UnderDog37
  • Visitor
17 years 5 months ago #1692 by wlayton
Replied by wlayton on topic Re: Why don't Richt try cox at Q.B.?
Get him and any of his friends

PVBDAWG

Please Log in to join the conversation.

More
Time to create page: 0.028 seconds