Just making sure.....

....that I don't pull for UF if I don't have to. I know it's a long shot, and all the planets and moons would have to align, etc,etc,etc, but let's pretend UT and SC get their required 2 more losses, and we win out. If UK beats UF today, and we beat UK, then we would both have 2 losses at the end and the only tiebreaker for two teams is head to head, right?

Sounds about right.

I thought so, but on the SEC's website they have 6 or 7 tiebreakers for 2 teams after head to head, and I just couldn't think of any circumstance where head to head wouldn't decide it. Maybe it was written before overtime was enacted???

sadlerdawg, this might help.

www.secsports.com/index.php?s=&chang...mp;url_article_id=46

Yeah, buc, that's the one I saw, I was just wondering why they had tiebreakers after the head to head, because that should decide it by itself, shouldn't it?

The UK and UF game is irrelevent, isn't it because we play both of them and if we beat both, we all have 2 losses (well UF would now have 3, you get the idea) but we are ahead of them because we beat them head to head. We need USC and UT to have THREE losses because they beat us.