Maybe I should have been more specific. Pick coaches who are available. Tedford, Leach, Bellotti and Stoops aren't going anywhere. They're entrenched at their schools. Stoops has won a national championship and half of the Big Twelve Championship games that have ever been one. Bellotti and Tedford have people - including myself - believing that their schools will contend for national championships soon. Leach...well, TTU deserves Mike Leach, and he deserves them.
Butch Davis just got to UNC, so they're not letting him go. Plus, he hasn't proven he can win there.
No one in this country would agree with you that Will Muschamp or Major Applewhite is even ready to head coach in a major conference, let alone that either of them would be a \"better choice\" than Mark Richt.
I'm not saying -- nor is anyone else here saying, I don't think -- that Mark Richt is not responsible or should not be accountable for how the Dawgs are doing. But you seem to be the only one saying we should out-and-out fire him and get someone new because you're impatient. The great coaches -- the National Championship coaches -- both won early and then suffered a drop-off. Butts won two SEC Championships and a National Championship in his first eight years. He won another SEC Championship in his tenth and then experienced an eleven-year drop off. In 22 years he won four SEC titles. Dooley won two SEC Championships in his first five years and then didn't win another one for eight years. Richt has won three divisional titles and two conferences in his first five years. As far as I can tell, HE IS FOLLOWING OUR STORIED AND RESPECTED TRADITION PERFECTLY.
Don't tell me who we should and should not be losing to, especially Tennessee. Before Richt got to Georgia we hadn't beaten UT in Knoxville since 1980. Donnan beat them once, ending a NINE YEAR DROUGHT. And as all the Urnge Idiots pointed out last year, Tennessee owns the all-time series, which has been played LESS THAN THIRTY-FIVE TIMES. EVERY COACH WHO HAS COACHED GEORGIA HAS AT SOME POINT LOST TO VANDY AND KENTUCKY. Dooley did it in the same season -- just like Richt! -- in 1973. If you truly believe that the SEC is a conference that is a cut above the rest, then you must necessarily believe that it is not -- like the Big Twelve or the Big Ten or the ACC or the Big East -- boringly top-heavy. You must believe that teams from the SEC can beat any other team in the nation, INCLUDING EACH OTHER.
And you bring up a point that we should not be losing to Georgia Tech...RICHT HAS NEVER LOST TO TECH.
I understand that you never directly called anyone a child. But by asking for adult responses, you were either implying that our responses were childish, or you were requesting porn. Either way, it's not appropriate for discussion, at least on this forum.
By the way, in an argument with me, NEVER bring up Quincy Carter as fuel for your side. Donnan didn't waste his talent; he wasted it himself.
You argue that I should not have brought up Dooley -- since he coached in a different era -- and yet one of your earliest posts introduced that idea. I believe the phrase \"DOOLEY SAVE US\" was used. I would argue with you that, while Dooley and Richt coach in different eras, your coaching choices are no less illogical. We always tout the SEC as being a different conference than other conferences, a cut above. Bellotti and Tedford coach in the PAC-10. Does success in the Pac-10 necessarily translate into success in the SEC? Ed Orgeron might argue with you, as he was the last successful Oregon coach to leave his school to head up a program here. Leach is a Big Twelve coach who likes to spread the field and pass all the time. With all of our touting of speed in the SEC, especially in the defensive secondaries, do you really think that Leach's pass-happy never-run offense would work? Or would his QBs just get picked off all the time?
Finally -- and this is really the main point -- your posts are pretty low-quality. You say nothing constructive, write in run-on sentences, have spelling errors and punctuation omissions, and generally display no grasp of proper grammar. Moreover, many of your arguments against our points really are rather childish, and run along the lines of \"That point is stupid! What a stupid idea!\" This is unfortunate because it obscures some of the more intelligent and pertinent points you make about coaching, our talent, and our performance over the last season and a half. I know that there are Dawg fans who are not bright -- my first game as a student was highlighted by another student throwing up five rows ahead of me...half an hour before a 12:30 kickoff! -- but I in no way have to converse with them.
And as for your complaints about what we are saying about you...well, we've said nothing that wasn't deserved. Either find another forum or grow some class.
Red and Black, Win or Lose