OldSouthDawg wrote:
Yes I understand what you are saying Wlayton, I agree they have had worse game plans. Its just IMO after the turn overs I would have ran alot more especially on 1st downs, our running game was effective. what really got m was in OT we have the good kicker and we are already in FG range. so instead of throwing it up for grabs. why not run down there throats or let AM take it himself just couldnt believe they came out throwing in that situation. We should have ran more like in the KY game or last yrs GT IMO. I am more for CMB being gone. I still think CMR should get another yr. Just really upset after that game. I am proud that they fought like that though. They gave it all they had. Just hope they bounce back and keep fighting we still have some games to win!!!!! GO DAWGSSSS P.S. Hey wlayton how do you think our D will stand up to techs option? IMO I think we will defend them better than uf just because uf has a better passing threat to keep you honest.
OSD, while I think the play calling was fine I DO think that in OT we should have played it a little closer to the vest. Mainly because if it came down to the kicking game......advantage UGA. Imo, the coaches should have considered that as a big strategy, our PK vs. their PK. We should have made sure we didn't turn the ball over and give UF's kicker a chance to choke it away (assuming we could stop them).
Much tougher to run the ball against UF than UK.
And, our 3-4 will shut down GT.
Plus.......we WILL beat AU in two weeks, count on it.