dapolla wrote:
sadlerdawg wrote:
I'm really looking forward to hearing the sunshine pumping Willie Martinez cheerleaders explain to us (again) why this shouldn't be blamed on him.
Well, I'm no CWM cheerleader, but if you take away the 2 turnovers that led to touchdowns, the final score is 52-27. That's a little better. If you take away the other short field our lousy kickoff team gave Arkansas on the reverse, it's a 52-20 final score. That's a little more palatable. Same thing against SCarolina; you take away the points they got off of turnovers and the safety and its ensuing possession, and you've got a 41-16 game. We HAVE to take care of the football. PERIOD.
Step one: Stop fumbling
Step two: Stop throwing INTs (Stafford had a huge problem with this too, by the way)
Step three: Tackle somebody on the kick return
Step three-point-five: Stop kicking the dang ball out of bounds
Step three-poing-five part II: Basically, stop giving the other team such short fields to work with.
So far, the only thing that's 100% Willie's fault this year is the second half of the South Carolina game. That was inexcusable. But again: take away short fields and Georgia destroys the Hawgs 52-20.
I still want Willie fired. But he's not the major problem right now. Fumbles, kickoff protection, interceptions and directional kicking are.
I get what you, dapolla, and others are saying about the turnovers and short fields. Big problems. But here's an idea--sometimes defenses stop the other team after a turnover. For our D, it just seems like they have an excuse and give up an autoamatic score after an offensive or special teams miscue. And here's a novel concept, something completely foreign to our D--sometimes, believe it or not, defenses create turnovers. Oh yeah, and they cover receivers on pass plays, too. The score could have still been 52-20 with the turnovers, like you said, if our defense covered people, or even 52-26 if they hunkered down and gave up FG's instead of TD's on the very first play after the turnover.