Since our loss to Tech have read a lot of fire the head coach and the other side, keep the head coach.
Fire the head coach posts that I have read have some valid reasons. Some are just ranting fools that don't have a clue.
Keep the head coach group intrigues me more. It is often asked from that group . . . . Who would we replace Richt with?
Thinking and talking to myself, I come up with this.
Florida came up with a head coach about two weeks after it was announced that Muschamp was told to leave, not asked, Foley does not handle hirings and firings that way.
Is Florida the only university that can replace a head coach with a quality head coach in that period of time?
Maybe with the bunch that run the football program in Athens could not or would not be able to do that . . . . right? wrong?
Only schools like Ohio State, Penn State, Florida and many others are capable of replacing their head coach without all of the BS that we hear coming from the side that says . . . . who would we replace Mark Richt with. The argument or lack of has no validity from where I sit.
Again, Mark Richt is going no where, so the folks that call themselves UGA supporters have nothing to worry about. He will continue to give them the 9/10 wins "most seasons". Of course when he dips below the 9/10 wins, there is as Wartdawg and others have said, "next year". Right now the "other side" are saying "2016".
Just talking to myself, again.