ugaa, did go to a site on the internet and came away with some baffling figures. Defensive figures are understandable, shows that all the talk that surrounds our D is what it is.
Had mentioned in another thread that playing our starting QB right now for the real game experience could only pay dividends for some time to come.
If the QB position were a bit more stable this year, with AJ and the troops that we have, makes one wonder what the numbers below would look like. Just sayin' . . . Go Dawgs!
From another Internet Source, anyone wants the site, glad to furnish.
Earlier this week — as I do in most weeks — I posted our updated offensive and defensive efficiency ratings for the SEC.
We take the number of plays run by each offense, divide by the number of touchdowns they’ve scored, and arrive at a plays-per-touchdown number that shows the “pure” efficiency of that unit.
For defense, we just reverse the process and divide the total number of snaps played by the number of touchdowns allowed.
After posting the numbers, I got an email from a reader suggesting I use only the numbers from in-conference games.
So that’s what I’ve done. Now our “Pure Efficiency” ratings are even purer. If that’s a word.
Below, you’ll find the results. Prepare to be surprised.
Offensive Pure Efficiency
Rank
School
Offensive Plays
Touchdowns
Plays/TD
1
Georgia
303
16
18.93
2
Arkansas
329
16
20.56
3
Tennessee
260
11
23.63
4
Auburn
365
13
28.07
5
Alabama
326
11
29.63
6
Kentucky
273
9
30.33
7
Florida
337
11
30.63
8
LSU
316
10
31.60
9
S. Carolina
350
9
38.88
10
Ole Miss
276
7
39.42
11
Miss. State
277
6
46.16
12
Vanderbilt
330
3
110.00
Defensive Pure Efficiency
Rank
School
Defensive Plays
Touchdowns Allowed
Plays/TD
1
Alabama
339
4
84.75
2
Florida
280
4
70.00
3
Tennessee
267
4
66.75
4
Ole Miss
265
5
53.00
5
LSU
332
8
41.50
6
S. Carolina
313
9
34.77
7
Vanderbilt
361
12
30.08
8
Miss. State
272
10
27.20
9
Georgia
352
16
22.00
10
Kentucky
266
13
20.46
11
Auburn
351
18
19.50
12
Arkansas
344
19
18.10