- Posts: 3065
- Thank you received: 890
Please Log in to join the conversation.
averagedawg wrote: Oh, by the way, Auburn already pays their players.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
dawgs_fans_dad wrote:
averagedawg wrote: Oh, by the way, Auburn already pays their players.
Yeah, they would vote against the union. Couldn't afford the pay cut.
Full disclosure: I used that about the Kentucky basketball team in a different forum. Still works.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
DAWGtm wrote: Against paying players. Ok with stipend check. On the point of players making money, It would be hard to regulate but if a player wants to sell his personal property without having a third party involved I think it should be acceptable.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.