- Posts: 10054
- Thank you received: 1252
TN Dawg wrote:
wlayton wrote: TN Dawg........their D is assumed to be on par with ours????? Assumed by whom??? In THAT prior conference they played in.......REALLY???
Wow.....now that is an expensive brand of COOL-AID.
Sorry, should have posted link. Think they may be speaking more specifically of DL.
Here it is: www.athlonsports.com/college-football/se...rly-predictions-2012
Please Log in to join the conversation.
wlayton wrote:
TN Dawg wrote:
wlayton wrote: TN Dawg........their D is assumed to be on par with ours????? Assumed by whom??? In THAT prior conference they played in.......REALLY???
Wow.....now that is an expensive brand of COOL-AID.
Sorry, should have posted link. Think they may be speaking more specifically of DL.
Here it is: www.athlonsports.com/college-football/se...rly-predictions-2012
Thanks TN Dawg......guess we'll see but I have a hard time believing their DL is on equal footing with ours. Their D was ranked 61st in the country last year........hmmmm, doesn't look like their front put much pressure on anybody to me.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
WoodstockDawg wrote: The discussion about us "historically not starting strong", is true, but we have not had this strong of a D in about 6 to 7 years, I think our calm comes from knowing our D can bail us out early.
I wouldn't be surprised if our D scored our first TD against Missouri...
Just my two cents.
GO DAWGS!!!
Please Log in to join the conversation.